A national study exploring the association between triglyceride-glucose index and risk of hyperuricemia events in adults with hypertension (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Prev Med Rep
  • v.43; 2024 Jul
  • PMC11144831

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

A national study exploring the association between triglyceride-glucose index and risk of hyperuricemia events in adults with hypertension (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jul; 43: 102763.

Published online 2024 May 17. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102763

PMCID: PMC11144831

PMID: 38831965

Leixia Wang,a Jianqian Chao,a, Na Zhang,a Yanqian Wu,a Min Bao,a Chenyuan Yan,b Tong Chen,c Xinyue Li,d and Yiqin Chend

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Background

The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index has been recommended as a practical surrogate of insulin resistance (IR). However, the association between the TyG index and hyperuricemia among adults with hypertension remains to be elucidated.

Methods

We included and analyzed 3134 HTN patients and 4233 non-HTN participants from the cross-sectional 2013–2018 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to explore the association between the TyG index and hyperuricemia. Stratifed analyses were performed to assess the association in populations with different subgroups of hypertension.

Results

The prevalence of hyperuricemia was higher in HTN patients (28.00%) than in non-HTN participants (12.47%). The multivariable logistic regression showed that the TyG index was significantly associated with hyperuricemia. After multivariable adjustment, higher TyG index levels were found to be associated with a higher prevalence of hyperuricemia in HTN patients (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.37–4.17, Ptrend<0.001) and non-HTN participants (OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.45–4.69, Ptrend <0.001). Restricted cubic spline regression showed linearity of the associations between the TyG index and hyperuricemia (p-nonlinear>0.05). In the subgroup analysis suggested that the positive association seemed to be strong among male, alcohol use, and diabetes group (P for interaction<0.05).

Conclusions

TyG index, a practical surrogate of IR, was linearly and positively associated with hyperuricemia in HTN and non-HTN participants. Proactive measures are needed to prevent the comorbidity of IR-driven hyperuricemia in the future.

Keywords: Hyperuricemia, Triglyceride-glucose index, Hypertension, Insulin resistance, NHANES

1. Introduction

Hyperuricemia (HUA) is a common form of chronic metabolic disorder caused by an imbalance between uric acid production and excretion (Li et al., 2020, Copur et al., 2022). An epidemiological survey showed that approximately 21% of U.S. adults had hyperuricemia in 2016, and the prevalence is generally on the rise (Chen-Xu et al., 2019). While the vast majority of patients with hyperuricemia are asymptomatic, prolonged periods of elevated uric acid levels can lead to the deposition of monosodium crystals of urate, which can damage joint structures and eventually lead to gout (Dehlin et al., 2020, Major et al., 2018, Dalbeth et al., 2021). Furthermore, hyperuricemia is also thought to be associated with an increased risk of chronic conditions, including renal diseases, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and metabolic syndrome (Yu and Cheng, 2020, Borghi et al., 2022). Therefore, it is quite important to identify the high-risk population of hyperuricemia and provide early prevention.

Insulin resistance (IR) is a pathological condition of decreased sensitivity and responsiveness to the action of insulin caused by a variety of factors including genetics, environment, illness, and diet (Lee et al., 2022, Yang et al., 2018). Numerous studies have confirmed that insulin resistance plays an important role in the development and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases (Haffner, 2003, Louie et al., 2023). The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is derived from the logarithmic transformation of the product of fasting blood glucose and triglycerides. In clinical practice, the TyG index has been identified as an inexpensive and reliable surrogate of IR compared with the traditional homeostasis model (HOMA-IR) (Vasques et al., 2011).

Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between the TyG index and hyperuricemia in different populations. A retrospective case-control study found that the TyG index was an independent risk factor for hyperuricemia in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR[95%CI]:2.00[1.38,2.91]) (Qi et al., 2023). In addition, in a longitudinal study, the TyG index was also positively correlated in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) adults [15]. Recent studies have revealed the correlation between the TyG index and hyperuricemia in general populations, and the TyG index was more closely associated with hyperuricemia than obesity indices (Zhu et al., 2020, Han et al., 2023).

Although several studies have explored the correlation between the TyG index and hyperuricemia risk, it is unclear whether this risk also exists in hypertensive populations, who tend to have longer disease duration and more comorbidities. From all those facts, we hypothesized that the TyG index of hypertensive adults would positively correlate with the risk of hyperuricemia. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate the prevalence of hyperuricemia in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults and to explore whether there is a positive correlation between the TyG index and risk of hyperuricemia in hypertension (HTN) and non-hypertension (non-HTN), in the hope of providing some information on the prevention of hyperuricemia.

2. Methods

2.1. Study population and data definition

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is an ongoing cross-sectional study, which employed a complex, multistage probability design to collect nationally representative nutrition and health-related data on the civilian non-institutionalized U.S. population. The survey combined personal structured interviews, mobile physiological measurements, as well as laboratory tests. All participants provided written informed consent, and the study protocols were approved by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Research Ethics Review Board (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm).

In the current study, we used the data from three consecutive cycles of NHANES (2013–2014, 2015–2016, and 2017–2018), which provided information on serum uric acid value. HTN was defined as self-reported doctor diagnosis of hypertension, use of antihypertensive medications, or systolic blood pressure (SBP)≥140mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP)≥90mm Hg referring to the 2017 American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations (Cuspidi et al., 2018). Overall, there were 29,400 participants in NHANES from 2013 to 2018. We selected 7387 participants aged 18years and older who had completed measurements of serum uric acid, triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, BP and BMI. We also excluded 20 participants without self-reported diagnosis HTN information. Finally, we included a total of 7367 participants, of whom 3134 were HTN patients and 4233 were non-HTN (Fig. 1).

Open in a separate window

Fig. 1

Flowchart of study population selection, NHANES 2013–2018.

2.2. Ascertainment of the TyG index

Blood specimens were collected at mobile examination centers (MECs) by NCHS-trained professionals and stored under appropriate frozen conditions until shipped to laboratory for further testing. Glucose concentrations were analyzed as part of the routine serum biochemistry profile using the oxygen rate method employing a Beckman Oxygen electrode. Triglyceride was measured on the Roche Cobas 6000 chemistry analyzers. Details of the specimen measurement and quality control methods are provided in the NHANES Laboratory/Medical Technician Procedures Manual (LPM), which is available on the website. The TyG index was obtained by using the equation ln (fasting triglyceride [mg/dL]×fasting blood glucose (FBG) [mg/dL]/2).

2.3. Hyperuricemia assessment

Hyperuricaemia was determined by serum uric acid (SUA) values obtained from laboratory data. Well-trained professionals used the Beckman Coulter UniCel® DxC800 with a timed endpoint method to measure the concentration of SUA. In this study, the diagnostic criteria for hyperuricemia were serum uric acid levels≥7mg/dL (420µmol/L) in males and≥6mg/dL (360µmol/L) in females (Bardin et al., 2014).

2.4. Covariates

Sociodemographic characteristics were obtained from standardized questionnaires in NHANES 2013–2018, including age, gender (males, females), marital status (married, divorce), education (high school below, completed high school and more than high school), race/ethnicity (Mexican American, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and other races). Information on smoking status, alcohol use and physical activity were obtained through participant self-report. Smoking status was classified as never smokers (smoked<100 during lifetime), former smokers (smoked>100 cigarettes but had quit), or current smokers (smoked>100 cigarettes without quitting). Alcohol use was derived from two 24-hour dietary recall data, and participants were considered drinkers if they reported alcohol consumption on at least one 24-hour dietary recall. Physical activity was assessed by the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in NHANES. According to metabolism equivalent (MET) intensity, we categorized physical activity as inactive group (<3 METs), moderate active group (3–6 METs), and vigorous active group (>6 METs). Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were obtained from laboratory test data. participant's self-reported comorbidities, such as diabetes, renal failure, kidney stones, heart failure and stroke, were obtained from questionnaire data. In addition, HbA1c≥6.5% (48mmol/mol) or FBG≥126mg/dL could also be considered as a participant having diabetes.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Given the complex survey design considerations of NHANES, we applied appropriate sampling weights for our analysis. Continuous variables were expressed as means with standard deviations (SDs) or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs), and categorical variables were expressed as numbers (percentages). The difference between the HTN and the non-HTN group was compared by Student’s t-test (continuous variables with normal distribution) or Mann–Whitney U test (continuous variables with non-normal distribution), and χ2 test (categorical variables).

We applied multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between the TyG index and hyperuricemia in HTN and non-HTN participants, the results of the model were reported through odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We fitted three statistical models. Model 1 was unadjusted. Model 2 was adjusted for sex (male or female), age (continuous), education (less than high school, completed high school, or more than high school), race/ethnicity (Mexican American, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, or other), current smoking (yes or no), alcohol use (yes or no), and physical activity (inactive group, moderate group, or vigorous group). Model 3 was further adjusted for BMI, WC, FBG, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, HbA1c, and self-reported comorbidities (DM, renal failure, kidney stones, heart failure, stroke, hepatopathy, and hyperlipidemia). Quartiles of TyG index levels were determined based on the distribution in the study, and the linear trend was calculated by assigning a median value to each category as a continuous variable. Additionally, we performed subgroup analyses based on age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, smoking status, alcohol use, diabetes, and BMI in HTN patients. To estimate the dose–response relationship between the TyG index and hyperuricemia in the study population, we employed a restricted cubic spline regression model with three knots at the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles. Data processing and analysis were performed using R version 4.3.0, along with Storm Statistical Platform (https://www.medsta.cn/software). A two-tailed value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Participants characteristics

General characteristics and laboratory parameters of the 7367 participants, 3134 with and 4233 without hypertension, are presented in Table 1. The prevalence of hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients was 28.00%, which is significantly higher than that in the population without hypertension (12.00%). Among 3,134 patients with hypertension (mean age, 57.51years; 50.02% males), the median (interquartile range) TyG index was 8.79 (8.39, 9.26). Compared with non-hypertensive participants, those with hypertension were more likely to be non-Hispanic white, older, have lower leisure-time physical activity, higher BMI and education level, and have a higher prevalence of DM, renal failure, kidney stones, heart failure, stroke, hepatopathy, and hyperlipidemia (P<0.05). In addition, there were significant differences in WC, FBG, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, HbA1c, and SUA values between the two groups (P<0.05).

Table 1

Comparison of baseline characteristics between adults with and without hypertension in the U.S. from NHANES 2013–2018.

Participant characteristicsHTN (n=3134)Non-HTN (n=4233)P-value
HUA (n, %)879 (28.00)528 (12.00)<0.001
Age (years, mean±SD)57.51±0.3747.58±0.40<0.001
Males, (n, %)1,542 (50.02)2,019 (49.01)0.209
Married, (n, %)1,833 (64.06)2,507 (63.01)0.543
Education<0.001
<High school338 (5.62)300 (3.90)
Completed high school428 (10.02)615 (10.01)
More than high school2366 (84.36)3317 (86.09)
Race/ethnicity, (n, %)<0.001
Mexican American368 (6.00)736 (11.00)
Non-Hispanic white1218 (68.00)1544 (64.04)
Non-Hispanic black825 (13.00)705 (8.33)
Other723 (13.00)1248 (16.63)
Current smoking, (n, %)610 (19.01)795 (18.04)0.374
Alcohol use, (n, %)281 (11.02)344 (11.01)0.216
Physical activity level, (n, %)<0.034
Inactive1885 (53.90)2351 (50.99)
Moderate656 (24.88)913 (24.04)
Vigorous593 (21.22)969 (24.97)
BMI (kg/m2) [M, (P25, P75)]30.00 (26.00, 35.00)27.00 (23.00, 31.00)<0.001
WC (cm, mean±SD)106.10±0.4599.98±0.39<0.001
FBG (mg/dL)116.96±0.97108.24±0.48<0.001
TC (mg/dL, mean±SD)190.74±1.16188.69±0.89<0.001
TG (mg/dL, mean±SD)145.39±2.71128.07±1.84<0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL, mean±SD)53.752±0.5954.87±0.380.053
LDL-C (mg/dL, mean±SD)107.18±0.93)107.02±0.720.564
HbA1c (%)5.95±0.035.65±0.02<0.001
SUA (mg/dL) [M, (P25, P75)]5.70 (4.70, 6.80)5.19 (4.30, 6.00)<0.001
TyG index [M, (P25, P75)]8.79 (8.39, 9.26)8.44 (8.07, 8.88)<0.001
Self-reported comorbidities, (n, %)
DM1127 (31.00)580 (11.01)<0.001
Renal failure214 (5.21)50 (1.12)<0.001
Kidney stones400 (14.00)320 (8.22)<0.001
Heart failure220 (5.41)34 (0.61)<0.001
Stroke223 (5.92)60 (1.11)<0.001
Hepatopathy208 (6.91)127 (2.61)<0.001
Hyperlipidemia2637 (86.01)2558 (71.01)<0.024

Open in a separate window

All estimates accounted for complex survey designs. Data are described as mean±standard deviation (SD) or medians (interquartile ranges) for continuous variables, or as numbers (weighted percentages) for categorical variables.

HTN, hypertension; HUA, hyperuricaemia; TyG index, triglyceride-glucose index; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoproteins cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c, Haemoglobin A1c; FBG, fasting blood glucose; SUA, serum uric acid; DM, diabetes mellitus.

3.2. Relationship of TyG index with hyperuricemia events

Table 2 shows the OR value and correlation trends of the TyG index with hyperuricemia events after the modeling logistic regression. 879 and 528 hyperuricemias were identified in HTN and non-HTN subjects, respectively. Among participants with hypertension, higher TyG index was significantly associated with elevated risk of hyperuricemia. After adjusting for all covariates, the positive association remains statistical significance.. The multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) across quartiles of the TyG index were 1.00 (reference), 1.44 (0.99, 2.09), 1.71 (1.14, 2.58), and 2.39 (1.37,4.17) (P trend<0.001). Similarly, hyperuricemia was associated with the higher quartiles of the TyG index among participants without hypertension. After multivariable adjustment, we found a significantly higher prevalence of hyperuricemia in non-HTN participants with the highest quartile of TyG index than in those with the lowest (OR: 2.61, 95%CI: 1.45–4.69, P trend<0.001). We also found an interaction effect between hypertension (with or without) and TyG index on hyperuricaemia (P for interaction<0.05). The results of dose–response relationship analysis with restricted cubic spline (RCS) were plotted in Fig. 2. Higher TyG index levels were linearly positively associated with the prevalence of hyperuricemia both in HTN and non-HTN individuals (P for nonlinear>0.05).

Table 2

The association between TyG index and hyperuricemia among HTN and non-HTN participants, NHANES 2013–2018.

TyG indexHUA events/totalModel 1Model 2Model 3
OR (95CI)OR (95CI)OR (95CI)
HTN patients
Quartile 1 (<8.39)159/8331.001.001.00
Quartile 2 (8.39–8.79)205/7731.61 (1.14, 2.28)1.62 (1.11, 2.34)1.44 (0.99, 2.09)
Quartile 3 (8.80–9.26)247/7882.07 (1.50, 2.84)2.15 (1.51, 3.04)1.71 (1.14, 2.58)
Quartile 4 (>9.26)268/7402.68 (1.87, 3.84)2.86 (1.92, 4.27)2.39 (1.37, 4.17)
P trend<0.001<0.001<0.001
Non-HTN participants
Quartile 1 (<8.17)80/13741.001.001.00
Quartile 2 (8.17–8.59)107/11101.52 (1.01, 2.29)1.63 (1.07, 2.47)1.19 (0.76, 1.86)
Quartile 3 (8.60–9.04)157/9382.68 (1.79, 4.01)2.96 (1.96, 4.47)1.77 (1.11, 2.83)
Quartile 4 (>9.04)184/8114.01 (2.75, 5.85)4.56 (3.00, 6.94)2.61 (1.45, 4.69)
P trend<0.001<0.001<0.001

Open in a separate window

Data are presented as OR (95% CI) unless otherwise noted. Model 1: Unadjusted; Model 2:Adjusted for sex, age, education, race/ethnicity, smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity. Model 3:Model 2+BMI, WC, FBG, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, HbA1c, and self-reported comorbidities (DM, renal failure, kidney stones, heart failure, stroke, hepatopathy, and hyperlipidemia).

Open in a separate window

Fig. 2

Dose-response association between TyG index and hyperuricemia in U.S. adults (A) with and (B) without hypertension, respectively. Adjusted for sex, age, education, race/ethnicity, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, BMI, WC, FBG, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, HbA1c, and self-reported comorbidities (DM, renal failure, kidney stones, heart failure, stroke, hepatopathy, and hyperlipidemia). The blue line shows the OR value and the blue shaded areas indicate the 95% CI. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TyG index, triglyceride-glucose index; P nonlinear>0.05 indicates a significant linear relationship. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

3.3. Subgroup analysis among hypertensive patients

We performed stratified analyses to further reveal the relationship between the TyG index and hyperuricaemia in different subgroups among HTN patients (Fig. 3). Significant associations of TyG index with hyperuricemia risk were found in each stratum of age, sex, and alcohol use (P<0.05). In addition, we found significant interactions in three subgroups: sex (male vs. females), alcohol use (yes vs. no), and DM (yes vs. no). Male with hypertension had a great risk (OR=1.67, 95%CI:1.37–2.05) of developing hyperuricaemia than female (OR=1.31, 95%CI:1.09–1.56, P for interaction=0.025). Hypertensive patients who drink alcohol are at greater risk (OR=1.88, 95%CI:1.21–2.91) of developing hyperuricaemia compared to non-drinkers (OR=1.45, 95%CI:1.26–1.67, P for interaction=0.031). Similarly, the association was strong comfirmed in the diabetes group compared to the non-diabetes group (OR=1.98, 95%CI:1.64–2.39, OR=1.11, 95%CI:0.92–1.34, P for interaction<0.001).

Open in a separate window

Fig. 3

Subgroup analysis of TyG index and hyperuricemia in U.S. adults with hypertension, NHANES 2013–2018. DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; TyG index, triglyceride-glucose index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. All ORs were adjusted for sex, age, education, race/ethnicity, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, BMI, WC, FBG, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, HbA1c, and self-reported comorbidities (DM, renal failure, kidney stones, heart failure, stroke, hepatopathy, and hyperlipidemia).

4. Discussion

In this nationally representative study, the relationship between the TyG index and hyperuricemia was evaluated. The main finding of this study is that the TyG index was positively associated with hyperuricemia in the American adult population. The restricted cubic spline indicated that the association was linear across the TyG range. This finding was also validated in adjusting for other covariates. Moreover, the subgroup analysis suggested that the positive association seemed to be strong among male, alcohol use, and diabetes group (P for interaction<0.05). Previous studies have examined the relationship between TyG index and hyperuricaemia among patients with hypertension in clinical setting (Liu et al., 2023, Dong et al., 2022 Jan 2). To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship of the TyG index with hyperuricemia in U.S. adults with HTN using the NHANES database, which is derived from a national, community-oriented survey.

Hyperuricemia plays a pathogenic role in the progression of CVD. A prospective cohort study showed that hyperuricemia increased the risk of HTN 1.17-fold (Sundström et al., 2005). A 9-year follow-up study also indicated a positive correlation between serum uric acid level and HTN (Mellen et al., 2006). The presumed mechanism by which hyperuricemia contributes to CVD involves renin-angiotensin system activation, IR, inflammatory reaction, and oxidative stress (Waheed et al., 2021). We found that 28.00% of HTN patients had hyperuricemia, which supports the evidence that hypertensive patients are at high risk and need early identification and control. Furthermore, in the setting of IR and HTN, many patients with hyperuricemia may be at risk for being “rapid progressors” to more severe comorbidities (Johnson et al., 2018).

Insulin is a peptide hormone consisting of 51 amino acids that is important for energy metabolism and maintaining homeostasis. IR, originally used to describe diabetics who require high doses of insulin (Tahapary et al., 2022). There is increasing evidence that IR is also associated with metabolic syndrome, which includes hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obesity, leading to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study assessing the causal relationship between IR and hyperuricemia and gout based on genome-wide association data and the UK Biobank database suggested that hyperinsulinemia leads to hyperuricemia and that reduction of insulin resistance may reduce serum urate concentrations and the risk of gout (McCormick et al., 2021).

Currently, the gold standard method for IR is the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) method, but this method is invasive and labor intensive (Tahapary et al., 2022, Muniyappa et al., 2008). As a simple surrogate for IR, multiple studies have validated the effectiveness of the TyG index in the assessment of IR and prevention of its IR-driven comorbidities. However, few studies have focused on the relationship between the TyG index, a practical surrogate of IR, and hyperuricemia. In a population-based nationwide cohort study of 5269 Chinese individuals (aged≥45years), Han Y et al found that those with low-to-high TyG index had a significantly higher risk of hyperuricemia compared to individuals with maintained low levels of TyG index, which was consistent with the results of this study (Han et al., 2023). Another study in the medical examinations population also found that the TyG index was more closely related to hyperuricemia than obesity indices (e.g., body roundness index, visceral adiposity index, and waist-to-height ratio) (Kahaer et al., 2022). The positive association between IR and hyperuricemia has been attributed to several mechanisms. Firstly, IR destroys oxidized phosphates, leading to an increase in the level of adenosine, which is sodium-retentive and therefore reduces the excretion of uric acid. In addition, IR enhances the inflammatory cascade and leads to hepatic dysfunction, which increases xanthine oxidoreductase activity, resulting in hyperuricaemia (Han et al., 2023, Waheed et al., 2021, Yanai et al., 2021, McCracken et al., 2018). Our subgroup analysis showed that hypertensive patients who were male, alcoholics or had comorbid DM had a higher risk of hyperuricemia.

Hypertension is a global public health concern. Patients with hypertension are often complicated by a variety of metabolic disorders, including hyperlipidemia, obesity and DM. We found that 86% of the hypertensive patients were comorbid with hyperlipidemia and nearly one-third had DM. It is acknowledged that TyG index is positively associated with the prevalence of DM and hypertension (Luo et al., 2022). The result of this study suggested that the TyG index was linearly and positively associated with the risk of hyperuricaemia in patients with HTN. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was performed to validate the universality of the association. Our study had several strengths. Based on a cross-sectional design, the current study is among the first to evaluate the associations of TyG index with hyperuricemia in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults with HTN. Moreover, multiple potential confounders were carefully adjusted, including sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and various physiological and biochemical parameters. We investigated the relationship between the TyG index and hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients, a specific group. This demonstrates that the TyG index may be useful in identifying HTN patients at high risk for hyperuricemia and guiding further detection and treatment. Despite the strengths, several limitations should also be noted. First, the NHANES is an observational study design, causality inference between TyG index and hyperuricemia could not be established. Thus, further prospective cohort studies are needed. Second, although several important covariates were adjusted, we cannot completely eliminate residual effects of other potential confounders, such as purine-rich diet and medication use and family history of hyperuricemia.

5. Conclusions

In a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults with HTN, we found the TyG index, a practical surrogate of IR, was linearly and positively associated with the risk of hyperuricemia. Our study provides some evidence for the value of the TyG index in the prevention of hyperuricemia in hypertensive populations. Proactive measures are needed to prevent the comorbidity of IR-driven hyperuricemia in the future.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Projects of the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 22AZD082).

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study protocol for the US NHANES was approved by the US NHANES institutional review board and National Center for Health Statistics Research ethics review board. All participants provided written informed consent. Institutional review board approval was waived for this analysis because of the publicly available and deidentified data.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Leixia Wang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Conceptualization. Jianqian Chao: Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Na Zhang: Software, Methodology, Investigation. Yanqian Wu: Validation, Software. Min Bao: Visualization, Validation, Software. Chenyuan Yan: Software, Project administration. Tong Chen: Methodology, Formal analysis. Xinyue Li: Formal analysis, Data curation. Yiqin Chen: Visualization, Software.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • Bardin T., Richette P. Definition of hyperuricemia and gouty conditions. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2014;26(2):186–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Borghi C., Agnoletti D., Cicero A.F.G., Lurbe E., Virdis A. Uric Acid and Hypertension: a Review of Evidence and Future Perspectives for the Management of Cardiovascular Risk. Hypertension. 2022;79(9):1927–1936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen-Xu M., Yokose C., Rai S.K., Pillinger M.H., Choi H.K. Contemporary Prevalence of Gout and Hyperuricemia in the United States and Decadal Trends: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–2016. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(6):991–999. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Copur S., Demiray A., Kanbay M. Uric acid in metabolic syndrome: Does uric acid have a definitive role? Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2022;103:4–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cuspidi C., Tadic M., Grassi G., Mancia G. Treatment of hypertension: The ESH/ESC guidelines recommendations. Pharmacol. Res. 2018;128:315–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dalbeth N, Gosling AL, Gaffo A, Abhishek A. Gout [published correction appears in Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1808]. Lancet. 2021;397(10287):1843-1855. [PubMed]
  • Dehlin M., Jacobsson L., Roddy E. Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence, treatment patterns and risk factors. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020;16(7):380–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dong J., Yang H., Zhang Y., et al. Triglyceride-glucose index is a predictive index of hyperuricemia events in elderly patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2022;44(1):34–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haffner S.M. Pre-diabetes, insulin resistance, inflammation and CVD risk. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2003;61(Suppl 1):S9–S18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Han Y., Zhou Z., Zhang Y., Zhao G., Xu B. The Association of Surrogates of Insulin Resistance with Hyperuricemia among Middle-Aged and Older Individuals: A Population-Based Nationwide Cohort Study. Nutrients. 2023;15(14):3139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson R.J., Bakris G.L., Borghi C., et al. Hyperuricemia, Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Report of a Scientific Workshop Organized by the National Kidney Foundation. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2018;71(6):851–865. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kahaer M., Zhang B., Chen W., et al. Triglyceride Glucose Index Is More Closely Related to Hyperuricemia Than Obesity Indices in the Medical Checkup Population in Xinjiang, China. Front Endocrinol (lausanne). 2022;13 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee S.H., Park S.Y., Choi C.S. Insulin Resistance: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies. Diabetes Metab. J. 2022;46(1):15–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li L., Zhang Y., Zeng C. Update on the epidemiology, genetics, and therapeutic options of hyperuricemia. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020;12(7):3167–3181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu S., Zhou Z., Wu M., et al. Association between the Triglyceride Glucose Index and Hyperuricemia in Patients with Primary Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2023;15(2023):5582306. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Louie J.Z., Shiffman D., McPhaul M.J., Melander O. Insulin resistance probability score and incident cardiovascular disease. J. Intern. Med. 2023;294(4):531–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Luo Y., Hao J., He X., et al. Association Between Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Serum Uric Acid Levels: A Biochemical Study on Anthropometry in Non-Obese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022;15:3447–3458. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Major T.J., Dalbeth N., Stahl E.A., Merriman T.R. An update on the genetics of hyperuricaemia and gout. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018;14(6):341–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCormick N., O'Connor M.J., Yokose C., Merriman T.R., Mount D.B., Leong A., Choi H.K. Assessing the Causal Relationships Between Insulin Resistance and Hyperuricemia and Gout Using Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2096–2104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCracken E., Monaghan M., Sreenivasan S. Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome. Clin. Dermatol. 2018;36(1):14–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mellen P.B., Bleyer A.J., Erlinger T.P., et al. Serum uric acid predicts incident hypertension in a biethnic cohort: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Hypertension. 2006;48(6):1037–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Muniyappa R., Lee S., Chen H., Quon M.J. Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage. Am. J. Phys. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;294(1):E15–E26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Qi J., Ren X., Hou Y., et al. Triglyceride-Glucose Index is Significantly Associated with the Risk of Hyperuricemia in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023;16:1323–1334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sundström J., Sullivan L., D'Agostino R.B., Levy D., Kannel W.B., Vasan R.S. Relations of serum uric acid to longitudinal blood pressure tracking and hypertension incidence. Hypertension. 2005;45(1):28–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tahapary D.L., Pratisthita L.B., Fitri N.A., et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of insulin resistance: Focusing on the role of HOMA-IR and Tryglyceride/glucose index. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2022;16(8) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vasques A.C., Novaes F.S., de Oliveira M.a.S., et al. TyG index performs better than HOMA in a Brazilian population: a hyperglycemic clamp validated study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2011;93(3):e98–e100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Waheed Y., Yang F., Sun D. Role of asymptomatic hyperuricemia in the progression of chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2021;36(6):1281–1293. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yanai H., Adachi H., Hakoshima M., Katsuyama H. Molecular Biological and Clinical Understanding of the Pathophysiology and Treatments of Hyperuricemia and Its Association with Metabolic Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases and Chronic Kidney Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(17):9221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang Q., Vijayakumar A., Kahn B.B. Metabolites as regulators of insulin sensitivity and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19(10):654–672. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu W., Cheng J.D. Uric Acid and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update From Molecular Mechanism to Clinical Perspective. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu B., Wang J., Chen K., et al. A high triglyceride glucose index is more closely associated with hypertension than lipid or glycemic parameters in elderly individuals: a cross-sectional survey from the Reaction Study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020;19(1):112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Preventive Medicine Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

A national study exploring the association between triglyceride-glucose index and risk of hyperuricemia events in adults with hypertension (2024)

FAQs

A national study exploring the association between triglyceride-glucose index and risk of hyperuricemia events in adults with hypertension? ›

After multivariable adjustment, higher TyG index levels were found to be associated with a higher prevalence of hyperuricemia in HTN patients (OR: 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.37–4.17, Ptrend < 0.001) and non-HTN participants (OR: 2.61, 95 % CI: 1.45–4.69, Ptrend < 0.001).

What is the normal range for triglyceride glucose index? ›

Follow us:
VariableGroup
With metabolic syndrome (n=89)Without metabolic syndrome (n=436)
Triglycerides and glucose index
Men9.2±0.68.3±0.5
Women9.0±0.58.1±0.5
5 more rows

What is a good TyG score? ›

Results using the modified TyG Index formula indicate that a TyG Index of 5.05 was associated with the highest risk of a cardiac event, and a TyG Index of 4.33 was associated with the lowest risk; results were 9.33 versus 7.95 using the original equation (Neglia 2021).

Is a higher triglyceride glucose index associated with increased likelihood of kidney stones? ›

Higher Triglyceride–Glucose Index Is Associated With Higher Likelihood of Kidney Stones. For nephrolithiasis, a positive association between TyG index and nephrolithiasis was observed.

What is the triglyceride glucose index CVD? ›

People with elevated TyG index levels are vulnerable to abnormal glucose and lipid metabolism, endothelial dysfunction, coagulation disorders, and smooth muscle cell dysfunction, all of which contribute to the pathogenesis of CVDs.

What is the cut-off for triglyceride glucose index? ›

The area under the curve (AUC) of the TyG index according to ATPIII criteria showed values of 0.746 (0.721-0.771; p = 0.001). The cutoff point according to the Youden index was 4.72, with sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 88.2%, respectively.

What is a safe range for triglycerides? ›

Triglyceride levels usually fall into the following categories: Healthy: Below 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for adults; lower than 90 mg/dL for children and teens (ages 10-19) Borderline high: Between 150 and 199 mg/dL. High: Between 200 and 499 mg/dL.

What is a high triglyceride score? ›

A simple blood test can reveal whether your triglycerides fall into a healthy range: Normal — Less than 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), or less than 1.7 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) Borderline high — 150 to 199 mg/dL (1.8 to 2.2 mmol/L) High — 200 to 499 mg/dL (2.3 to 5.6 mmol/L)

What score means you have diabetes? ›

Fasting blood sugar test.

Results are interpreted as follows: Less than 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L ) is considered healthy. 100 to 125 mg/dL (5.6 to 6.9 mmol/L ) is diagnosed as prediabetes. 126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L ) or higher on two separate tests is diagnosed as diabetes.

What is a bad score for diabetes? ›

An HbA1c value above 75mmol/mol results in an increased risk of complications for people with diabetes. We will work with you via our High HbA1c pathway with the aim to improve long term glucose control.

What kidney disease causes high triglycerides? ›

Nephrotic syndrome is a group of symptoms and abnormal test results that include protein in the urine, low blood protein levels in the blood, high cholesterol levels, high triglyceride levels, increased blood clot risk, and swelling.

What is the biggest contributor to high triglycerides? ›

Factors that can lead to high triglycerides include:
  • Drinking too much alcohol.
  • Eating too many refined carbohydrates (like white bread) or sugars.
  • Eating too much saturated fat.
  • Not moving around enough (sedentary lifestyle).

Do obese people have high triglycerides or diabetics? ›

Having high triglycerides -- a type of fat in the blood -- may be a sign you may have prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. Luckily, with some effort, you can lower your weight and increase your exercise which can lower your risk for both high triglycerides and diabetes.

What is the normal triglyceride-glucose index? ›

The TyG index is calculated according to the following equation: ln[FBS(mg/dl) × TG (mg/dl)/2] [1]. Normal cut-off values reported for the TyG in the literature are roughly around 4 and 8 [1-4]. This difference is due to the position of 2 in the TyG formula.

What level of triglycerides indicates diabetes? ›

A fasting triglyceride level of ≥150 mg/dl (≥1.70 mmol/l) is one of five accepted criteria for defining individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, arguably termed the “metabolic syndrome” (2–4).

What is a critical value for triglycerides? ›

Question 1: What is the critical value of the triglycerides? Critical value of the triglycerides is >500 mg/dL.

What is the optimal triglyceride level for diabetics? ›

Target LDL cholesterol levels for adults with diabetes are <100 mg/dl (2.60 mmol/l); HDL cholesterol levels are >40 mg/dl (1.02 mmol/l); and triglyceride levels are <150 mg/dl (1.7 mmol/l). In women, who tend to have higher HDL cholesterol levels than men, an HDL goal 10 mg/dl higher may be appropriate.

What is the triacylglycerol glucose index? ›

TyG Index and Framingham Risk Score

Triglyceride (TyG) index was ‎calculated as ‎‏TyG index = ln (fasting TG [mg/dL] × fasting ‎glucose [mg/dL]/2). The FRS for CVD risk was calculated to estimate the 10-year risk of cardiovascular diseases, according to 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines on the assessment of cardiovascular risk.

What is considered a high reading for triglycerides? ›

A simple blood test can reveal whether your triglycerides fall into a healthy range: Normal — Less than 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), or less than 1.7 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) Borderline high — 150 to 199 mg/dL (1.8 to 2.2 mmol/L) High — 200 to 499 mg/dL (2.3 to 5.6 mmol/L)

What is a good triglyceride ratio? ›

For example, 200 (triglyceride level) ÷ 55 (HDL) = 3.6 (triglyceride HDL ratio). Health experts designate the following triglyceride HDL ratios as follows: ideal: 2.0 or less. good: 4.0 to 6.0.

References

Top Articles
Vegan Ricotta Recipe (7 Ingredients!) - From My Bowl
Loaded Deviled Eggs Recipe
Aberration Surface Entrances
Swimgs Yuzzle Wuzzle Yups Wits Sadie Plant Tune 3 Tabs Winnie The Pooh Halloween Bob The Builder Christmas Autumns Cow Dog Pig Tim Cook’s Birthday Buff Work It Out Wombats Pineview Playtime Chronicles Day Of The Dead The Alpha Baa Baa Twinkle
Weeminuche Smoke Signal
Plus Portals Stscg
Daniela Antury Telegram
104 Presidential Ct Lafayette La 70503
Pro Groom Prices – The Pet Centre
Lonadine
Nebraska Furniture Tables
Mary Kay Lipstick Conversion Chart PDF Form - FormsPal
iOS 18 Hadir, Tapi Mana Fitur AI Apple?
Craigslist Blackshear Ga
Teenleaks Discord
Carolina Aguilar Facebook
Eva Mastromatteo Erie Pa
Nail Salon Goodman Plaza
Apply for a credit card
Aaa Saugus Ma Appointment
Outlet For The Thames Crossword
Viha Email Login
The BEST Soft and Chewy Sugar Cookie Recipe
Jeffers Funeral Home Obituaries Greeneville Tennessee
Two Babies One Fox Full Comic Pdf
Uncovering The Mystery Behind Crazyjamjam Fanfix Leaked
Essence Healthcare Otc 2023 Catalog
Workshops - Canadian Dam Association (CDA-ACB)
Random Bibleizer
4 Methods to Fix “Vortex Mods Cannot Be Deployed” Issue - MiniTool Partition Wizard
Craigslist Rome Ny
897 W Valley Blvd
Alternatieven - Acteamo - WebCatalog
Amazing Lash Bay Colony
Taktube Irani
Kokomo Mugshots Busted
Hattie Bartons Brownie Recipe
Bay Focus
Die Filmstarts-Kritik zu The Boogeyman
Today's Gas Price At Buc-Ee's
MSD Animal Health Hub: Nobivac® Rabies Q & A
Actor and beloved baritone James Earl Jones dies at 93
The Wait Odotus 2021 Watch Online Free
Rocket Lab hiring Integration &amp; Test Engineer I/II in Long Beach, CA | LinkedIn
Cch Staffnet
Sandra Sancc
Lorton Transfer Station
Benjamin Franklin - Printer, Junto, Experiments on Electricity
Canonnier Beachcomber Golf Resort & Spa (Pointe aux Canonniers): Alle Infos zum Hotel
Arginina - co to jest, właściwości, zastosowanie oraz przeciwwskazania
Makemkv Key April 2023
Escape From Tarkov Supply Plans Therapist Quest Guide
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Emmett Berge

Last Updated:

Views: 6153

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Emmett Berge

Birthday: 1993-06-17

Address: 787 Elvis Divide, Port Brice, OH 24507-6802

Phone: +9779049645255

Job: Senior Healthcare Specialist

Hobby: Cycling, Model building, Kitesurfing, Origami, Lapidary, Dance, Basketball

Introduction: My name is Sen. Emmett Berge, I am a funny, vast, charming, courageous, enthusiastic, jolly, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.